Marina at Clump Point - Who Cares?
  • The Facts
    • WHO IS CCA
  • GBRMPA DECISION REVIEW

SHOW ME THE NEED!

5/2/2018

0 Comments

 
The proposal for the  Clump Point Port/marina is based on a 'WISH LIST' produced by SOME of the members of the Reference Group.  Here's what it says in the  Public Information Package (PIP)

"The Reference Group (RG) members also provided information about a number of issues including the likely size of vessels that should be considered (see Table) and the desirable facilities to be included in any design". 

Some of  the reference group members and local marine tourism operators (who attended meetings as  'expert advisers') wanted the existing jetty to be included in the overall considerations.  Any discussion about the jetty was denied. 

The facilitator even went as far as to say 
"the minister would get angry if the jetty was mentioned and that he didn't like the references already being recorded in the minutes"  

The State government refused to consider input from the RG other than the range of  proposals they specifically limited to Clump Point. 


Here's the 'wish list'
Picture
Reef Goddess ------Operates from Dunk Island
Island Spirit ------- Water Taxi. Beach landing between Mission Beach/Dunk Island. Uses Clump                                                   Point pontoon during rough conditions.
Big Mama ---------  Left the area solely because of weather conditions. (Not enough sunny days) 
Island Voyager -- Not operational
Spiegel ------------   Not operational
Betty Lou  -------   Operates from Cardwell
Quickcat ---------   Not operational
Reef Magic -------  Operates from Cairns
Mary Little ------- Happy at Hull River
Jarrah T  ----------  Operates from Hull River
Recreational ---   All fictional ​
The list (above) includes two large 150 passenger cats and another 70 passenger vessel. These three vessels alone comprise 370 passengers without counting the other charter vessels on the list,  one of which is a tourist sailing boat that left the area solely because of weather conditions. (Not enough sunny days) 

When the Clump Point (now called the Perry Harvey) jetty supported a thriving tourism industry in the 80's, Dunk Island resort was operating at capacity and the Cairns reef tourism industry was limited to Green Island.   Passengers were bussed from Cairns.  Mission Beach tourism businesses experienced pressure to operate even when weather conditions were unfavourable.  Locals working on the large fast boats often described their day  by  how many paper bags were used by the passengers. 

The larger boats became non-viable when Cairns developed as an international World Heritage Reef and Rainforest  destination. 


Existing tourism businesses don't operate reef tours in weather that would cause discomfort to passengers.

International studies have shown that tourists now prefer a more personal, cultural  and natural experience that relates to a local community.    

Mission Beach has got it all and is developing a strong identity and character as a low key village atmosphere supporting boutique businesses.

The Queensland Government is leading the proposal for Clump Point. There has been:
  • NO  studies to show supposed NEEDS
  • NO market research to support visitor demand 
  • NO statistics showing how many days a year tourist  boats can expect to operate from Mission Beach.
  • NO  consideration for existing BOUTIQUE OWNER OPERATOR  MARINE TOURISM  OPERATORS
  • NO  consideration for sustainable nature based tourism
  • NO consideration for the dire condition of the The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park or the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area.
  • NO consideration for long term ECONOMIC STABILITY
There are much better solutions for an upgrade of marine facilities that would give far more long term surety for businesses  and be more appropriate for a place that is positioned at the meeting of two World Heritage Areas.​


Given the large number of claims in the Public Information Package (PIP) that can be shown to be untrue - 
​WE DEMAND AN INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE PROCESS.



You can help by emailing GBRMPA
A short email supporting the information on this site will make the difference!  Check out all our posts 
Your comments must be referenced as G39785.1. 
to [email protected] before 17 February 2018.
Public Information Package here​

Keep up to date - Follow our facebook page


.


Picture
0 Comments

Trojan Horse – State Government wastes local community time - ASH media release

2/2/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
0 Comments

Boaties invited from Townsville to Cairns and the Tablelands to use Clump Point Boat Ramp.

2/2/2018

2 Comments

 
Picture

Enough of the false claims! 
 

Lets start with the letter to the Editor
​published in the Jan 31  Townsville Bulletin 
MBBA President's claim
The facts
​"At long last the Mission Beach area looks likely to reap the benefits of the decades-long campaign to improve boating facilities for recreational users and commercial boat operators"
Don't you mean the decades-long campaign for a marina at Boat Bay?
Commercial interests will benefit at the expense of recreational boaties. 
Who is this proposal going to benfit?  Developers and real estate agents are very excited. 

"GBRMPA’s assessment is the project’s final hurdle".
The Mission Beach Clump Point Boating Infrastructure Project has not yet received all state and federal approvals.
“Tick and flick” State approvals are proceeding without EIA or public consultation, under pressure to be completed before GBRMPA’s Comments deadline.

"Funding is guaranteed by the State Government".
TMR Public Information Package states gov funding is not guaranteed see pages 11,17, 22. (link  on icon right) 
​Watch out for next stage. Who will it be to try again for private marina facilities in beautiful Boat Bay?
Picture
Click to download TMR Public Information Package

"We believe it is important that the Cassowary Coast and the wider community from Townsville to Cairns including the Tablelands, whose boaties are all regular visitors to Mission Beach, let the GBRMPA know that most of us support these much-needed boating improvements. Precise details and designs are available in an information package at hhtp/-Boating- facilities/Clump-Point- Mission-Beach or contact me for a brochure."
Most of us? – or just your mates?
This project started 6 years ago to address the congestion and conflict created by commercial operator/s hogging the space at the recreational boat ramp.
  • There is a maximum capacity of about 60 car/trailer parks on Clump Point
  • Why would anyone want to drum up more boatie visitors from as far away as Townville, Cairns and the Tablelands when there is already no room at the inn? If not to create pressure for a commercial marina?
  • Why would anyone want to introduce commercial use to an area that can't cater now to current local recreational needs?
Why would anyone go even further and suggest incorporating industrial use?

Poor Clump point! 
 Increased congestion!
More conflict!

What about our relaxed village atmosphere?
Our access and enjoyment of our own peaceful bay?
Picture
WAIT - THERE'S MORE!

​"Please indicate your support for this environmentally sound project to GBRMPA"
"At a time when off-shore corals are dying, this project will trash a thriving coral reef, destroy an unquantified area of benthic habitat, ruin the special beauty on which Mission Beach relies for tourism, and change the local ecology.
​
No wonder the government didn't want genuine public consultation.”

Margaret Moorhouse. 
see ASH media release

signed
PETER HEYWOOD
President, Mission Beach Boating Association Inc

A quick check on Peter Heywood's background:
  • Former Director of Mission Beach Harbour Pty Ltd
  • Former Real Estate Agent
  • Speculative Land developer
  • Proponent of (failed) marina development proposal of (World Heritage) wetland at Coquette Point
  • Spoke on behalf of both Mission Beach Boating Association  AND Mission Beach Community Association, when it suited, while on the Reference Group.

You can make a difference

GBRMPA  wants to hear from interested persons " ESPECIALLY those who believe that the proposed use will RESTRICT THEIR REASONABLE USE OF THIS PART OF THE MARINE PARK"  are invited to lodge written comments on the proposal with the Authority

Deadline for comments by 17 February 2018.
​Your comments
MUST be referenced as G39785.1.

[email protected] 
​

Tell them what you think in your own words. 
  • This proposal DOES NOT HAVE CONSERVATION OR TRADITIONAL OWNER  SUPPORT
 
  • This is NOT THE SAME (original) PROPOSAL that was approved and now abandoned by the state government​. 
 
  • This NEW PROPOSAL HAS HAD NO PUBLIC CONSULTATION. Despite the repeated claims to the contrary in TMR's Public Information Package  (PIP)(click icon right)
  
  • The  propsal will INCREASE CONGESTION AND USER CONFLICT
​
  • The project will INHIBIT YOUR ACCESS AND ENJOYMENT OF BEAUTIFUL AND TRANQUIL  BOAT BAY
​
  • The proposal is NOT  just an UPGRADE OF  RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
​
  • This will BECOME A PORT/MARINA
​
  • TMR is applying for the full extent of works  to support the present and future marine infrastructure needs of the Mission Beach area. WHERE ARE THE SUPPORTING  STUDIES TO SHOW THE NEEDS?  
​
  • Only part of  this proposal can be delivered SUBJECT TO AVAILABLE FUNDS
​
  • If approved, FUTURE EXPANSION as a commercial port and marina IS INEVITABLE
​
  • Where will the extra funds come from? Is this a TROJAN HORSE OPENING THE WAY FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISE through the Qld Government's Public/private partnerships (PPP) program?​

  • Disturbance to the sea bottom (excavation and reclamation) associated with the proposal WILL RELEASE SEDIMENTS INTO THE OCEAN CURRENTS adding to the suspension of pollutants within Boat Bay (a habitat protection zone), Clump Point fringing reef and find their way to the outer reefs  65% impacted by  coral bleaching and currently heavily impacted by Crown of Thorns.

  • Increased pressure on a STRESSED AND DYING REEF WITH DIMINISHING FISH STOCK. ​
​​
  • We've been  LED UP THE GARDEN PATH!  Deliberately HOODWINKED!
​
  • We are relying on, and ASKING GBRMPA, TO USE THE DISCRETION UNDER THEIR ACT - Regulation 88Q (p) 'Any other matters' to PROTECT OUR WORLD HERITAGE AREA

  • ​Given the large number of claims in the Public Information Package (PIP) that can be shown to be untrue - WE DEMAND AN INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE PROCESS.

Remember this?!

Picture
Picture
Click to download TMR Public Information Package
2 Comments

    The Facts

    This blog presents the facts  about  development being planned for Clump Point. 

    Join the conversation and share on facebook
    ​

    Castaways threatening letter
    Letter to community from vested interest

    ..
    --------------
    Background
    information
    ​
    --------------
    ..


    Archives

    July 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.